Hans-Bernhard Bröker, on Monday, May 20, 2019 04:23 PM, wrote... >Am 20.05.2019 um 21:12 schrieb Jose Isaias Cabrera: > >This is the most portability-ignorant open source package I've seen in a >long time, and by a very wide margin. They don't even _try_ to >accomodate the notion that there might be anything else but Linux left >under the sun.
You said it, but I agreed. :-) >> so according to Bedrock [1] this is all I need to build it: > >Well, in all fairness, those are just the instructions for one type of >Linux distribution. There are others, but those would not get you any True, but I thought it would be the closest "linux flavor" in comparison to Cygwin. There is a set of Mac build steps. I started with that. First built brew in cygwin, but then when tried to do 'brew install gcc@6' got a bunch of errors and I just thought that building gcc6 from scratch without brew would be the best way to go, but it wasn't. >In short, this whole source is doomed to fail utterly on any system >whose C standard library is not GLIBC. Reminiscing way back in the days... Marlon Brando, "You don't understand! I coulda had class. I coulda been a contender. I coulda been somebody instead of a bum, which is what I am." -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
