Erik Soderquist, on Monday, May 20, 2019 10:16 AM, wrote... >On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 3:44 PM Bob Cochran wrote: ><snip> >> "Cygwin? this is probably still functional, but now can be considered a >> (pre)historic solution." > >The words of the ignorant, in my opinion. Cygwin has done an >excellent job of maintaining currency and usefulness.
Indeed. I have been using cygwin since 1996-7. Can't remember the exact year, but it has been God-sent, and it has been in every Windows machine I have had control. Just my 0.02. Thanks. josé -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
