On 2018-12-01 17:09, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 1 16:52, Houder wrote:
On 2018-12-01 16:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 1 15:31, Houder wrote:
> > Hi Corinna,
> >
> > Hard work pays off ... (you did it again).
> >
> > 64 LANG = en_US.utf-8, LC_ALL =
> > => LANG = en_US.utf-8
> > PATH (64) = /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/drv/c/...
> > LET OP: v2.12.0 of cygwin1.dll
> > /ext/build/mknetrel/src/cygwin-snapshot-20181201-1/winsup/cygwin/cygheap.cc
> > 64-%% uname -a
> > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 Seven 2.12.0(0.330/5/3) x86_64 Cygwin
>
> Hmm, ok. First I thought this is a problem with the new clock, but in
> fact the timestamp is generated at build time and I'm building on Linux.
>
> I can't reproduce this with a local build, so it must be something
> in terms of the DLL being build for a snapshot DLL, hmm...
Huh?
[snip]
I'm referring to the missing date in uname -a (aka uname -v).
Apparently this is a long-standing problem (2.5 yrs) in the script
creating the version information when building a snapshot. I uploaded
YA snapshot to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ which should be back to a
valid date info.
Got it.
Repeated procedure ...
/ext/build/mknetrel/src/cygwin-snapshot-20181201-1/winsup/cygwin/cygheap.cc
64-%% uname -v
2018-12-01 16:02
64-%% uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 Seven 2.12.0s(0.330/5/3) 2018-12-01 16:02 x86_64 Cygwin
64-%%
Henri
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
