On 31 December 2017 at 16:13, Steven Penny <svnp...@gmail.com> wrote: > The POSIX standard, at least since 1997 [1], requires the presence of a > "lex" > utility. > > Most systems (including Cygwin) provide a Lex implementation via the "flex" > package. However with other OS, a "lex -> flex" symlink is provided, whereas > the > Cygwin package does not. > > Please resolve this, thanks. >
How POSIX compliant is Cygwin supposed to be? I don't think many of the tools are 100% POSIX compliant but are good enough so does making the symlink between flex and lex make it more compliant or less so because the tool doesn't meet 100% compliance? -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
