On 11/07/2016 21:24, Vince Rice wrote:
On Jul 11, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Marco Atzeri <marco.atz...@gmail.com
<mailto:marco.atz...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 11/07/2016 18:40, Vince Rice wrote:
Is there a reason there’s a different version of cvs in 32-bit vs
64-bit Cygwin?
32-bit shows 1.12.13-10.
64-bit shows 1.11.23.
(Yes, I know, git forever, but not everyone got the memo.)
--
https://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-07/msg00054.html
1.11.23-2 is the last version for both arch
Regards
Marco
Hmmm. Then I wonder how this is true.
The available one from setup are
cvs-1.11.22-1
cvs-1.11.23-2
https://cygwin.com/packages/x86/cvs/
As I wrote in the ADVICE the upgrade
from 1.12.13-10 to cvs-1.11.23-2 can only
be managed manually, as setup is considering the
1.12.13-10 version higher than 1.11.23-2.
This unusual upgrade is not managed by the current logic in setup.
It was in the past but it created other upgrade problems.
Regards
Marco
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
