On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:38:54PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: >Although removing the syslogd seems natural, since the syslog(3) send >the info directly to EventLog, it is wrong.
We didn't "remove" syslogd. It never existed. Requests sent to the ether for someone to do something for you rarely work. If you want a syslogd, then there is a really simple voting procedure. Provide the source code to implement it. Then people get to evaluate your method and see if it makes sense. If enough people decide that it makes sense, then it becomes part of cygwin. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
