On Apr 14 19:00, Takashi Yano wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:52:05 +0200
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > If it's that simple, why does my STC (or a simple variation thereof) not
> > complain?
>
> It is because optimizer removes the function call.
>
> Try:
>
> $ cat > m.cc <<EOF
> #include <cstdio>
> #include <cmath>
>
> int main()
> {
> long double x, y;
> scanf("%Lf %Lf", &x, &y);
> printf("%Lf\n", atan2l(x,y));
> return 0;
> }
> EOF
> $ g++ m.cc -lmThanks! So that's why my testcase didn't work :} This is actually a problem in libstdc++-v3. On platforms missing certain long double functions libstdc++-v3 is built with stub functions using the same name. Jon, any chance to rebuild the gcc packages ASAP? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

