On 9 March 2016 at 15:53, Erik Soderquist <eriksoderqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Mar 9 16:54, Erik Soderquist wrote: > <snip> >>> If I knew how, I would... >> >> https://cygwin.com/setup.html >> >> A couple of months ago I made sure that portable LibreSSL from >> https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable.git at least doesn't >> forget to support Cygwin, should we ever intend to switch. I don't >> expect any (serious) bit-rot so far. > > I meant that I'm not a programmer at all; I've only written scripts > before, and am just barely started studying my first programming > language. > > If actually knowing the language isn't needed, I can certainly try, > but if knowing the language the package is written in is required, I'm > currently woefully under qualified to take up the mantle >
It isn't really usable unless you are a programmer because it isn't a fall in replacement for openssl. [It may work but mostly needs recompiles and a lot of programming fixes to get it to work with other things.] I would say that if you aren't in that camp.. you don't really need it at the moment. > -- Erik > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple