Gen Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After re-libtoolize-ing the sources (to allow it to produce shared > libs) the compilation is fine through glib and will produce > libglib-2.0.la, but will complain about undefined references to > things like '_g_free' and '_g_log' (which I presume is in > libglib-2.0.la). I've attached the output from make (upon a second > run, after it going through glib).
Libtool bug (incorrect handling of def files in archive_expsym_cmds). Still present in CVS. I'll see if I can patch it. Max. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/