On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Michael Enright wrote: > When changing from compiler to compiler, even if it be just an OS > point version upgrade, implicit header inclusions go away all the > time. As a developer, I just shrug this off as one of the trade-offs > of choosing to develop in C or C++, which lack proper module systems. (snip)
Please don't top-post. No need for a trade-off. Include-what-you-use ( http://code.google.com/p/include-what-you-use/ ) will tell exactly which headers are needed, so there's no need to rely on which header includes which. Csaba -- GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++ The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers. Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts. "Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds "People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
