Lasse Collin had written.
... the possibility of EINTR is mentioned for specific commands and F_SETFL
isn't among them.
A subtle and maybe minor but valid objection.
Am 23.02.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Feb 23 11:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 22 22:07, Lasse Collin wrote:
Alternative idea: Would there be a significant downside if Cygwin
remembered if non-blocking mode was enabled at some point and close()
would use that flag instead of the current (non)blocking status to
determine if the background thread hack should be used?
No, that should be doable with very minor effort.
That's still an option, of course.
I think that sounds like a solution.
------
Thomas
---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
http://www.avast.com
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
