On Jan 28 11:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 27 15:02, Cary Lewis wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Corinna Vinschen > > --neverexits works, but not if the program that cygrunsrv starts is > > stopped with a kill -9 signal. Perhaps the -9 signal propagates to the > > cygrunsrv.exe program? > > Hmm, yes. Cygrunsrv evaluates how the service process ended, and only > if it exited the neverexits logic comes into play. If it ended due to > a signal, it does nothing. > > This is unfortunate because it diminishes the usefulness of --neverexits. > I could patch cygrunsrv to do this: > > If the service exited due to a signal, and if that signal is not the > defined termination or shutdown signal (default SIGTERM for both), > and if --neverexits has been defined, then performas the neverexits > action. > > Does that sound ok? > > The patch is simple and I could upload a new cygrunsrv today or tomorrow.
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2015-01/msg00041.html Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgp0uM48N6gb4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
