On May 2, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Reini Urban writes: >> perl, perl_vendor, perl_manpages, perl_debugbuild > > The debug package is actually named perl_debuginfo at the moment, but > perhaps it should be renamed perl-debuginfo to conform to all other > packages?
probably. I also found out that several vendor packages are now separated on x86_64, so I’ll have to split them also for 32bit. Lot more work todo for me, but apparently some guys just went ahead. > @INC looks strange: why do you keep vendor_perl for 5.10, but not for > 5.14? Do we really want to fall back to site_perl 5.10 and 5.8 these > days? oops, vendor_perl/5.14 is missing. yes, falling back to good old arch-unspecific code is no problem and saves installation time and space. and we did support those versions. still working on unexpected socketpair problems with 64bit. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
