On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 05:08:12PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote: >On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>There will probably be some gotchas to work out for places which refer >>to http://cygwin.com/ directly. Please send any issues here, as >>always. > >It appears it is not forcing HTTPS through a 301 redirect, is this >intentional?
I didn't say "http is no longer available" so, yes, it is intentional. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
