On May 15 01:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:07:26PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > >Are we close to a resolution of the problems with default manifests? It > >looks to me like all the pieces are in place, but maybe I've missed > >something: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01387.html > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16790#c9 > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16807#c8 > > > >I'm not trying to rush any maintainers, but I'm asking because I > >currently have to use a self-built version of binutils, which doesn't > >provide a default manifest, because of the problem I reported here: > > > > http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-04/msg00199.html > > I'll update binutils ASAP.
For the default manifest to get going we also need the patcha new GCC with Nick's patch from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01378.html Is that easily backportable to GCC 4.8, or does 4.8 not support the %if-exists functionality? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpzec9JMIUqW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
