On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:26:01PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote: >On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> I've taken the ball back. We don't need a new maintainer. > >You clearly do, as I have shown. You are just choosing not to take one >on. That is your right of course. Let us continue the status quo. > >>I've spoken with Eric. I'm relieved that he still wants to stay on. >> >>If his, or any other maintainer's update speed is not meeting >>expectations then please, as suggested, just build the packages for your >>own use.
You aren't privy to my private conversation with Eric. I'm clearly satisfied that he will get around to updating his packages and I am confident in his ability to follow through on this. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
