On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 02:33:18AM +0000, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote: >cgf wrote: >>You seem to have no problem asking for help with cygserver without >>insulting cygserver in the process. Possibly you're even interested in >>improving cygserver. > >I was trying to submit a bug report in good faith (and many tries, for >that matter), yet the only way to do that was through this list. But >the list was bouncing my posts, which I had finally cut short of the >strace output, which I thought was a valuable piece of information, and >which you guys would not receive now, thanks to the filter...
Uh, yeah. I (and likely everyone else) got this. It is a pretty simple scenario. Your valid email was blocked. You were mad about it and rather than follow the advice in the bounce message, you complained to the mailing list. I reiterated what you could do to help improve the situation but now you've chosen to state the obvious, cutting the parts of my email which told you how you could help rectify the situation. My point was that you seem to be willing to help diagnose the problem with cygserver but unwilling to diagnose the problem with the spam filter. You're wasting bits complaining here. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
