Hi Achim,
thanks for testing. On Feb 27 09:07, Achim Gratz wrote: > Achim Gratz writes: > > "noldap" > > Sorry, copied the "getgroups" data again, this is the data for "noldap" of > course: > > 0.171u 0.015s 0:01.03 17.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3298pf+0w > 0.093u 0.140s 0:00.97 23.7% 0+0k 0+0io 3292pf+0w > 0.046u 0.093s 0:00.97 13.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3285pf+0w > 0.062u 0.140s 0:00.97 20.6% 0+0k 0+0io 3283pf+0w > 0.031u 0.124s 0:00.97 15.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3285pf+0w > 0.093u 0.077s 0:00.99 16.1% 0+0k 0+0io 3291pf+0w > 0.093u 0.077s 0:00.96 16.6% 0+0k 0+0io 3298pf+0w > 0.015u 0.077s 0:00.97 8.2% 0+0k 0+0io 3291pf+0w > 0.093u 0.108s 0:00.99 19.1% 0+0k 0+0io 3300pf+0w > 0.062u 0.109s 0:00.97 16.4% 0+0k 0+0io 3294pf+0w 1 second? That sounds still a bit slow. Considering that I'm now member of 414 groups, and you are member of 440 groups, the extra number of groups cannot account for that. This sounds surprisingly as if the names of some of your groups are not cached on your machine. Or something. Or is this a rather slow machine?!? Still, it seems like the right thing to do to drop the group name configuration stuff entirely. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpXJx_AJ3Ijz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
