On Feb 10 23:05, Denis Excoffier wrote: > Hello, > > I use XP SP3 with 32 bits and also Seven 32 bits. Today i could exercise 4 > new snapshots. > > The first two had the same problem (tested on XP): it seems that every > program that has to perform something in connection with user/id/passwd etc. > produces a stackdump (id, tar etc.). > > The last two (the last one is dated 18:34:44 UTC) had the same problem (first > tested on XP, second on Seven): windows produces a message showing ‘bash.exe’ > complaining that cygwin1.dll is not a valid windows image. > > After that, i’m back into 1.7.28-2 or snapshot-dated-20140209. But which one > is the latest? Compare the following: > > With snapshot-dated-20140909, cat /proc/version | tr ‘\100’ ‘Z’ produces: > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 version 1.7.29s(0.271/5/3) (cgfZ) (gcc version 4.7.3 > 20130411 (Fedora Cygwin 4.7.3-1) (GCC) ) 20140209 18:32:26 > while cygwin-1.7.28-2 produces: > CYGWIN_NT-5.1 version 1.7.28(0.271/5/3) (corinnaZcalimero.vinschen.de) (gcc > version 4.8.2 20131016 (Fedora Cygwin 4.8.2-2) (GCC) ) 2014-02-09 21:06 > > Ok, the first one is from Seven, the second one is from XP. But, since this > is local time, it’s perhaps ok that the time of 1.7.29s is _before_ 1.7.28-2. > But what for the > format of this `uname -v` part? Dashes or not? Seconds or not?
1.7.28-2 has been specificially created as a bugfix release, after we had already bumped the version number in CVS, so the release date is nothing to worry about. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpIZWTbwAMY4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
