Thanks Am 31.12.2013 16:03, schrieb Jon TURNEY: > On 31/12/2013 14:31, Franz Fehringer wrote: >> I will not send you further personal email. >> What i really meant was that i read in one of your announcements about >> clipboard integration not fully working with the 64bit X server. >> The reason why i came up with xwinclip is that i was under the (possibly >> wrong) impression that xwinclip reappeared as a consequence of this >> clipboard integration deficiency. >> So the real question is: Is it true that clipboard integration is not >> fully working with the 64bit X server and if so will this change in the >> foreseeable future? > > No, clipboard integration for 64-bit X server has been working since 1.14.1-2 > (See [1]). > > [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree-announce/2013-06/msg00001.html > >> Am 31.12.2013 14:59, schrieb Jon TURNEY: >>> On 31/12/2013 10:19, Franz Fehringer wrote: >>> Firstly, do not send me personal email. >>> >>> Please read http://cygwin.com/problems.html#personal-email, particularly the >>> section starting "Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a Cygwin >>> developer or package maintainer?" >>> >>>> It seems xwinclip is still needed, what are the perspectives about this? >>> >>> I don't understand what you are trying to say here. >>> >>> If you are assuming that xwinclip is normally needed, because it is >>> provided, >>> then perhaps you should do some testing. It is not. >>> >>> See [1] and 'man xwinclip' for more details. >>> >>> To anticipate the next question: xwinclip is provided to assist in debugging >>> clipboard integration problems, and because it is useful with the >>> experimental >>> XtoW window manager. >>> >>> If you are reporting a bug that xwinclip is needed when it shouldn't be, >>> then >>> more information is needed. >>> >>> [1] http://x.cygwin.com/docs/ug/using-clipboard-integration.html >
-- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
