On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 08:26:37PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote: >Il 12/1/2013 8:03 PM, Christopher Faylor ha scritto: > >> We don't support either cyg-get or "cholatey" (this is the first I've >> heard of it) here. > >nether I ever heard before, but I find funny that on > >http://chocolatey.org/packages/cyg-get > >the Authors and Copyrights Owner are reported as Redhat.
Heh. I think 99% of the Net thinks that Cygwin is a Red Hat project populated by Red Hat engineers. That used to bug me even when I worked for Red Hat. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
