On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 04:19:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Nov 13 09:01, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:15:02AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> >On Nov 12 18:37, Ryan Johnson wrote: >> >> On 12/11/2013 5:30 PM, JonY wrote: >> >> >Right now, it is guarded by: >> >> >#if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || (__STDC_VERSION__ >= 199901L) >> >> > >> >> >Which means non-strict mode and C99 mode, snprintf was not part of >> >> >C++03. I guess (__cplusplus >= 201103L) needs to be added to newlib. >> >> Yes, this has come up before [1]. Several *printf variants are >> >> affected IIRC. >> >> >> >> [1] http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-04/msg00140.html >> > >> >I wouldn't mind to see patch submissions fixing stuff like that on the >> >newlib mailing list. Not at all. >> >> What an odd notion. > >Yeah, I'm that crazy sometimes.
Yeah, I know. Crazy cat lady. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
