On Nov 4 20:18, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2013-11-04 08:45, Charles Wilson wrote: > >My about-to-be-uploaded inetutils update puts the servers in libexecdir > >aka /usr/libexec/ -- and changes the /etc/defaults/ associated xinetd > >and inetd.d configuration files as appropriate. 'Course, my > >to-be-written update announcement will be a horrific, as current users > >with customized configuration WILL have to modify their files (and setup > >doesn't have an .rpmsave/.rpmnew mechanism). > > > >The currently-distributed version (and associated xinetd scripts and > >sample inetd.d/ configuration files) puts them in /usr/sbin. > > > >If --libexecdir=/usr/lib, then...what? > > > >Should I revert to /usr/sbin for slave servers? Use $libexecdir but > >"know" that it is going to be /usr/lib and configure appropriately? I'm > >confused as to how to proceed here. > > Under the circumstances, configuring inetutils with > --libexecdir=/usr/sbin makes the most sense.
Full ACK. Otherwise you'd have to provide some script which tweaks an existing /etc/inetd.conf to use the new paths. Possible, but hardly worth the effort. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpvdptuQOxhK.pgp
Description: PGP signature