Please, no <http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU>.
On 6/17/2013 3:27 PM, Vasiliy wrote:
Ok, I understand, and, yes, it's also about setup.exe. That would be true if the package was marked as 'a test package', aka those marked '[test]' in setup.ini, but what if they were not? From my example bash 4.2 is not marked as [test] (I've changed 'installed.db' file accordingly), yet setup(64) downgrades it to 4.1 Why not use two conditions instead of just one? Say, 'if package is more recent, and not marked as [test], then do not downgrade (keep)'.
That is the way it works for non-test packages. I'm not sure what mirror you're using but on mirror.mcs.anl.gov, bash 4.1.11 is the only version available for x64. -- Larry _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
