On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On May 17 12:56, Fedin Pavel wrote: >> Hello! >> >> > The reason for this behaviour has been outlined a couple of times on >> > this list. See http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-01/msg00173.html, >> > for instance. >> >> Heh... >> So, complete emulation would cost a major performance drop, right ? >> Well... Can there be any setting which enables these checks ? At least we >> have one use case... > >Not without lots of new code.
So, maybe next Thursday? cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
