On Nov 23 18:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Nov 23 17:47, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote: > > > I agree. I'll do that in the next couple of days. > > > > Thank you. Please let me know when you do, so that I can > > check the relevant snapshot out. > > Yes, I'll try.
I just checked in the change. > > Incidentally, have you been able to confirm the dead-locking > > that I reported earlier (below)? I just ran the patched cygserver > > with the "-d -l 7" arguments, along with my test case, and both > > dead-locked just as before. > > No, I didn't test that. If you have any chance to debug that, I'd > appreciate it. ...especially since I can't reproduce this. I tried with cygserver before and after my patch and in both cases your semaphore testcase worked as expectd with -d -l 7. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
