On Oct 23 19:07, Bob Heckel wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Keith Christian wrote: > > > > w3m works, but appears to run slowly after the last update. While > > comparing the output of "cygcheck -s -r -v" I noticed some > > differences. > > Sorry you're having trouble. Strange, I did benchmarking in > development and found 0.5.3 slightly faster than 0.5.2 > > > Line 24 below shows Incomplete. > > I'm not sure what's causing that, I show "OK" on my installations. > > > I re-ran setup.exe, removed w3m, then re-installed from the same > > mirror, no change. > > Did you have 0.5.2 installed previously? > > > Is this output satisfactory, or is there a corrective action for this > > package post-install? > > I can't replicate it currently, I'll look into it further over the > next few days and report back or up-version if I see anything wrong or > fixable. > > If anyone else is experiencing w3m-0.5.3-1 trouble, that would be good to > know.
I just had a look into the tar archive, and I see two weirdnesses in terms of the directory entries in the archive. - The permissions of all dirs are 700, but they should be 755, ideally. - Dir entries in a tar archive usually have a trailing slash. In w3m-0.5.3-1.tar.bz2 they don't. Maybe that's what cygcheck is choking about. Incidentally the w3m-0.5.2-2.tar.bz2 archive looks "normal". Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
