On 2012-04-04 10:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 4 16:54, Denis Excoffier wrote:
-#if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || (__STDC_VERSION__>= 199901L)
+#if !defined(__STRICT_ANSI__) || (__STDC_VERSION__>= 199901L) ||
(__cplusplus>= 201103L)
How is that supposed to work?
$ gcc -xc++ -std=c++98 -dM -E -< /dev/null | grep cplus
#define __cplusplus 1
$ gcc -xc++ -std=c++0x -dM -E -< /dev/null | grep cplus
#define __cplusplus 1
Actually I'm wondering if that's not a bug in gcc:
It is, and it has been fixed in 4.7.0[1]:
G++ now sets the predefined macro __cplusplus to the correct value,
199711L for C++98/03, and 201103L for C++11.
That being said, there are many such issues in the newlib and Cygwin
headers.
Yaakov
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
