Am 27.03.2012 10:36 schrieb Corinna Vinschen: > Needless to say that the ultimately most efficient way would be > to find a method to avoid rebase problems after fork at all. The > last attempt at it looked promising at first, but then again... > http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/windowsgeneraldevelopmentissues/thread/afdf1b68-1f3e-47f5-94cf-51e397afe073
You'd think all the statements about interoperability after the EU anti-trust cases would apply to Cygwin as well. If SUA can, Cygwin should as well: "Microsoft shall ensure that third-party software products can interoperate with Microsoft’s Relevant Software Products using the same Interoperability Information on an equal footing as other Microsoft Software Products. (“Interoperability Commitment”)". http://www.microsoft.com/Presspass/press/2009/dec09/12-16Statement.mspx Conveniently, nothing except a press contact is given on that page. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
