Re: 1.3.13: problem using ntohs() in asm/bytorder.h in gcc 3.2.

[Jens Yllman]

But isn't that just this implementation. Should I realy take for granted that they always are defines? When compiling without -O2 they seem to be functions.

Jens Yllman


--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/