On 1/24/2012 1:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
It's probably because your FS doesn't support ACLs. Your mount
output
//fs-irva-82/adefaria on /home/adefaria type netapp (binary,user)
shows that the path points to a NetApp drive. NetApp drives have
various modes. They can behave like FAT, NTFS, or a POSIX filesystem.
From your other report I assume it's set up not to support ACLs.
What does
$ /usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
print?
Ltsdo-adefaria:/usr/lib/csih/getVolInfo //fs-irva-82/adefaria
Device Type : 7
Characteristics : 10
Volume Name : <CIFS.HOMEDIR>
Serial Number : 0
Max Filenamelength : 255
Filesystemname : <FAT>
Flags : 40007
FILE_CASE_SENSITIVE_SEARCH : TRUE
FILE_CASE_PRESERVED_NAMES : TRUE
FILE_UNICODE_ON_DISK : TRUE
FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS : FALSE
FILE_FILE_COMPRESSION : FALSE
FILE_VOLUME_QUOTAS : FALSE
FILE_SUPPORTS_SPARSE_FILES : FALSE
FILE_SUPPORTS_REPARSE_POINTS: FALSE
FILE_SUPPORTS_REMOTE_STORAGE: FALSE
FILE_VOLUME_IS_COMPRESSED : FALSE
FILE_SUPPORTS_OBJECT_IDS : FALSE
FILE_SUPPORTS_ENCRYPTION : FALSE
FILE_NAMED_STREAMS : TRUE
FILE_READ_ONLY_VOLUME : FALSE
FILE_SEQUENTIAL_WRITE_ONCE : FALSE
FILE_SUPPORTS_TRANSACTIONS : FALSE
My guess is that FILE_PERSISTENT_ACLS: FALSE is not a good sign.
Is this related to this thread:
http://old.nabble.com/NetAPP---cygwin-1.7.7-1-avoid-Recycle-BIN-dot-files-td30236482.html?
In the next reply you advocate me getting a more recent "snapshot". Did
you mean a more recent "release" or do you want me to move to
"snapshots" (which I assume are sorta like betas. Skimming some of the
history (sorry I have a meeting fast approaching) this seems like a
fairly recent development. Has there been a resolution? (Gotta go, will
check back later).
--
Andrew DeFaria <http://defaria.com>
If you can't be kind, at least have the decency to be vague.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
