http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-cvs/2011-q2/msg00196.html introduced reordering of SH_- related memory blocks and the following change
| - unsigned size = offsets[i + 1] - offsets[i]; | + unsigned size = offsets[i] - offsets[i + 1]; | offsets[i] += delta; | if (!VirtualAlloc (off_addr (i), size, MEM_RESERVE, PAGE_NOACCESS)) However, address range is to be allocated using its LOWER boundary which is now offsets[i + 1]. Even prior the change, I wondered why member[1] is not also updated. Hence I also suggest that the allocation of [0], [1] and the last item should be double checked and perhaps commented in src. | for (int i = SH_USER_SHARED + 1; i < SH_TOTAL_SIZE; i++) "SH_USER_SHARED"+ 1 turns out to be 2. | continue; /* oh well */ :-) -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/%28CVS%29--SH_USER_SHAREDplus--allocation-tp32703126p32703126.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
