Corinna Vinschen, le Fri 19 Aug 2011 17:08:41 +0200, a écrit : > On Aug 19 16:06, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen, a écrit : > > > On Aug 19 15:14, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Corinna Vinschen, le Fri 19 Aug 2011 13:50:19 +0200, a Ãcrit : > > > > > > .wVirtualKeyCode = 0x630, > > > > > > > > Eergl, no, that should have been 0x30 here, our code does properly masks > > > > out the high part, I just missed that in our code. > > > > > > And what about the control code? It's a fixed 1 in your example, > > > > That's only the example. 1 is obviously not hardcoded in the real source > > code, which I have attached (I just initially wanted to avoid you having > > to browse into the whole not-so-readable source ). > > > > > but obviously it should be 6. > > > > That's clearly not obvious from an altgr point of view: people use altgr > > to type '@', so it makes sense to simulate the hit of the right alt > > (i.e. altgr). > > Typo on my part. I meant 5, the combination of RIGHT_ALT_PRESSED and > RIGHT_CTRL_PRESSED.
Well I understood the latter without even looking at the exact number actually :) > But RIGHT/LEFT CTRL should be equivalent anyway, as far as general > typing is concerned. CTRL, yes. > > > > Err, do you mean LEFT_ALT_PRESSED here? Right alt is altgr in some > > > > keyboard layouts, which is precisely what people use to type '@' in > > > > the french layout, actually. E.g. LeftAlt-A and RightAlt-A (i.e. > > > > > > I'm aware of this difference, so, no, that was a deliberate > > > RIGHT_ALT_PRESSED. > > > > But for the cases when only alt is to be pressed, this simulates a right > > alt, which with e.g. the french layout is not the same as the left one. > > Yes, just like the german one. However, to the best of my knowledge > there's no printable unicode char which requires to press left-alt on > any such keyboard layout. Yes, but there are shortcuts which use left-alt. > That's exactly what the AltGr == right-alt key is for, isn't it? For glyphs, yes. For instance, alt-e would open an edition menu, while altgr-e prints the euro symbol. > > > However, this also works for me when using > > > LEFT_CTRL_PRESSED and LEFT_ALT_PRESSED in the conditionals above. > > > > But it won't work with DOS applications (e.g. edit). That's precisely > > the reason why I added the special case. > > Uh, ok, I see. If you press AltGr on a keyboard layout which does not > distinguish Alt and AltGr, (english, for instance), the AltGr key only > emits a RIGHT_ALT_PRESSED control code. Ok. > On a keyboard layout which does > distinguish them, the AltGr key emits LEFT_CTRL_PRESSED | RIGHT_ALT_PRESSED. Ah. *that* is the part that I was missing :) I had assumed that RIGHT_ALT meant altgr. So we'll indeed simply simulate control as well, and it should work correctly. Thanks! Samuel -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
