> On Aug 3 10:48, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > > > > . . . > > > > > We're working on a new release of rebase anyway. This new release > > > checks for writability and prints just a warning without stopping > > > dead in its track: > > > > > > /usr/bin/foo.dll: skipped because not writable > > > > > Otherwise, what we can do is to open the file with > > > FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS. This would allow you to rebase DLLs > > > without write permissions if you have admin privileges. > > > > A combination of the two would be best, I think. That is, try > > FILE_FLAG_BACKUP_SEMANTICS, so for Admins it will work, and if _that_ > > fails print the message. > > I agree. I checked that in.
Thanks. I think that works. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
