On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:45:28AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:44:27AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>On Aug 2 10:58, David Rothenberger wrote: >>> I use git-svn extensively in my day-to-day work, and I noticed with >>> recent snapshots that some of the git-svn commands are hanging. I >>> narrowed it down to the 20110721 snapshot. 20110713 is the last one >>> that works fine. >>> >>> I realize this isn't exactly a STC, but I don't have the time right >>> now to narrow it down further (or the skills, really). I've attached >>> a script which reproduces the problem. It requires svn and >>> git-svn. In the script, the first "git svn init" command hangs with >>> 20110721, but the entire script succeeds with 20110713. >>> >>> I hope this is enough information to track down the problem, because >>> I was absolutely LOVING the speed increase in 20110801. >> >>This is not enough for me. I tried your script on W7 32 bit and Server >>2008 R2 64 bit, using Cygwin from CVS as well as the 20110801 snapshot, >>in in no case can I reproduce a hang. The script runs fine (and fast): > >I don't see a hang but I do see a: > >error: cannot fork() for git-svn: Resource temporarily unavailable > >I'll investigate that. Maybe it's related.
Huh. I ran rebaseall before reporting the above but, on inspecting the output from strace, I saw that dlls were getting located in non-rebased locations. So, I ran rebaseall again. *Now* I see the hang. Weird. So I guess I can investigate the actual problem now. FWIW, strace reports that the child of a fork has died with a SIGSEGV but I don't see the location of the SIGSEGV in the strace output. So it will be a little tricky to track down. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
