Hi, duncan_bayne wrote: > > Could someone please suggest a way of getting this working? > Sorry, this is not an exact reply to your question, but... I use shell instead of term, and have no problem having as many as I wish (one just needs to rename the buffers). But OK, shell doesn't support the control characters that term does.
Marc -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Multi-term-in-Emacs-under-Cygwin-doesn%27t-correctly-identify-terminal-type--tp31762666p31764406.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
