>On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:34:16PM -0400, bob 295 wrote: >>I recognize that Cygwin fifos are "buggy and not suitable for anything but >>simplest of applications", however in the spirit of seeing if things can be >>improved here is some more test code which illustrates one of the "bugs".
>Maybe I need to be clearer: I don't need demonstrations of bugs. I know >what doesn't work. >The fifo layer needs a total rewrite right now. Sending this type of email >is a waste of your time. >cgf Fair enough. Is that total rewrite underway? If so any idea when we'll see a workable version? If not what would it take to expedite things? More developer resources? What type of skillset would you need? Thanks again. bob -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
