On 2/15/2011 3:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> David Rothenberger wrote:
>> On 2/14/2011 12:11 AM, Gary wrote:
>
>>> If I can replace svn in the sequence with something else, for example
>>> tortoise, and everything then works, then Cygwin/svn *is* the culprit.
>>
>> If the bits are identical, then what else could be breaking your build?
>> Perhaps the permissions on files, as I suggested in the same email you
>> partially quoted above?
>
> You said:
>
>> [if bytes identiocal] I can't see how svn could be the culprit.
>>
>> Unless perhaps the permissions on some of the DLLs are different. It
>> might be worth using cacls to inspect the ACLs on some of the DLLs.
>
> I could't comment on that, because I hadn't had time to try it out. They
> are different - the files checked out with Tortoise correctly (I guess)
> have the various EXECUTE flags set, those with Cygwin's svn do not.
If those files have the svn:executable property set, then it's a bug in
Cygwin's svn. Otherwise, you just need to set that property on the DLLs.
Maybe TortoiseSVN does some special handling for DLLs.
--
David Rothenberger ---- daver...@acm.org
The Public is merely a multiplied "me."
-- Mark Twain
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
