On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:59:17AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: >Am 14.12.2010 02:59, schrieb Christopher Faylor: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:45:11AM +0300, Andrey Repin wrote: >>>Greetings, Eric Blake! >>> >>>>> coreutils 8.5-2 does not install a man page for the "[" command in >>>>> section 1. >>>>> This could/should be a symlink to test (test.1 contains the necessary >>>>> documentation), or a trivial roff file containing .so man1/test.1 >>>>> (untested). >>> >>>> Upstream coreutils does not provide a [.1 man page, even though it does >>>> provide a test.1 man page. On Fedora, test.1 is from coreutils, while >>>> [.1 is an alias to the bash builtins man page. I could repeat that >>>> setup in cygwin, since I already create bash builtin alias pages for >>>> other bash builtins, like shopt.1. >>> >>>That, probably, would be most desirable choice. >> >> I beginning to think that we need a new mailing list to discuss issues >> relating >> to '[' . Clearly 2011 will be the Year of the Left Bracket. > >You could take this a bit more serious. Lack of documentation isn't something >to joke about.
Cwealy you don't know me vewy well. [cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
