On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 05:11:46AM +0000, TryingToHelp wrote: >This is a known DOS/Windows bug. I'm fairly sure that DOS used NUL as a null >device, and that Windows kept it around (not sure why, guess it's for >backward-compatibility).
This thread is more than a month old. There is no reason to resurrect it. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
