On 10/5/2010 6:31 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > BTW, you do know that Ports includes an OpenCV build? Of course it > requires Ports' CMake: > > http://cygwin-ports.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cygwin-ports/ports;a=tree;f=graphics/opencv > ftp://ftp.cygwinports.org/pub/cygwinports/release-2/opencv > > Please let me know if this somehow does not suffice.
Yep, I'm using your version -- the only problem (it's not really a *problem*, per se) is, I have to rebuild it myself because the cygwin-ports version has a LOT of dependencies on other cygwin-ports packages. I don't need video stream handling, so I can drop all those requirements (like ffmpeg, etc). I'm trying to avoid "polluting" my installation with whole bunch of cygwin-ports packages, since that might "pollute" official builds of other packages I maintain. Yeah, I know I could have multiple cygwin installs to keep them separate, but... FYI, I also had to rebuild the cygwin-ports cmake from your -src package. When I installed the cygwin-ports binary package, cmake simply exited without doing anything -- but I don't see any missing DLLs in the cygcheck output. I suspect the issue is that you have built most of cygwin-ports using the beta gcc-4.5 (and, the new binaries require the libgcc1 DLL from 4.5). Again, I don't want to "pollute" my package maintenance installation with a beta compiler (or its runtime), so... -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
