I think the answer to the question below hinges on the appearance of a patch to implement 'nanosleep' from some interested party.
Larry Original Message: ----------------- From: Pierre Habraken [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:55:15 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 1.3.12-2: nanosleep unavailable <snip> Can one reasonably expect that Cygwin implement 'nanosleep' in the future ? Thanks for any help, Pierre -- ________________________________________________________________________ Pierre HABRAKEN - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tél: 04 76 82 72 83 - Fax: 04 76 82 72 87 IMAG-LSR BP72 38402 SAINT MARTIN D'HERES Cedex ________________________________________________________________________ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
