On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Matthias Andree <matthias.and...@gmx.de> wrote: > Am 08.04.2010, 08:11 Uhr, schrieb Christopher Faylor:
> > Not to suggest anything particular to Mark, but rather as a general comment: > I wonder how many of the "1.7.X no better" can be attributed to the > replace-on-reboot failure up to and including setup 2.693. If people rely on > that rather than running "uname -a" or similar, those that were told to > reboot may be unaware they're using the older version. > > -- When doing my testing, I explictly stopped all cygwin processes, copied whichever cygwin1.dll (1.7.2, .3, .4, snapshot) I wished to test into /bin (and Windows is very good about complaining when a cygwin process is still running when trying to overwrite the dll), fired up a shell, ran "uname -a" to assure I had what I thought I had. So, I am quite sure of what I was running. Mark -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
