On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:53:06AM +0100, Schmidt, Oliver wrote: >>>Please find attached the requested information. However I had to edit >>>it - as carefully as possible - to omit hints on the SAP-internal IT >>>infrastructure. > >>Thanks. It would be nice if we could come up with some way to make >>cygcheck not output sensitive information but I doubt that there's any >>foolproof heuristic that we could use and, if we added an option, people >>might trust it unduly. > >My remark wasn't meant at all as criticism. I rather wanted to apologize >for not fully following the instructions - which I understood to say to >attach the output straight as-is.
I was just making an observation. I wasn't interpreting this as a criticism. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
