On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Gregg Levine <gregg.drw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Karthik Balaguru > <karthikbalagur...@........> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Christopher Faylor >> <..............> wrote: >>> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:11:46PM +0530, Karthik Balaguru wrote: >>>>I have been trying to use the command of 'netstat -a -n -f inet' to >>>>generate a report on all network end points not just the ESTABLISHED >>>>(-a option) by printing the IP addresses as dotted-decimal numbers(-n >>>>option), but only for TCP and UDP end points(-f inet option). But, >>>>strangely, the '-f inet' option does not seem to work in cygwin. >>> >>> Not so strange. >>> >>> netstat isn't a cygwin command. It is a native Windows command. >>> >> >> :-) >> Interesting. >> Then, I think then there is some difference between the windows >> netstat and linux netstat. >> >> Thx, >> Karthik Balaguru >> > > Hello! > Quite so. The one included with the Linux TCP/IP packages provides > much more detail, and even finer details over what is seen, even > including what happens and of course why it does do that. And it is > constantly evolving. >
So, in linux, it has evolved alot ! Great ! > By contrast the Windows one, is based on an earlier one to match their > early BSD derived TCP/IP stack and is only slowly catching up. > So, windows version is not equivalent to that of linux . Okay ! > However further discussion is decidedly off topic for this group, and > I only decided to say even that much because CGF really didn't want > to. > Okay, i will discuss regarding it with the relevant forum. Thx, Karthik Balaguru -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
