On Feb 12 14:19, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > From: "Corinna Vinschen" > | On Feb 12 13:33, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > | >| > Matthias just tested what I did last night, which was based on what > | > you had sent, but also defining well_known_users_sid in security.h etc.. > | > | Sorry, but I don't understand what you mean. well_known_users_sid > | *is* already defined in security.h since my patch from 2010-01-08. > > Oops, I meant well_known_builtin_sid, like what you just did. > > | > Now cron works on his system. Looks like we are duplicating efforts! > | > > | > I just refreshed cvs and get_token_group_sidlist still has: > | > grp_list *= well_known_users_sid; > | > | Yes, sure. What's the problem? You wrote in > | http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2010-02/msg00291.html that always adding > | well_known_users_sid is a good idea from your POV. I currently don't > | understand what you're trying to say. > > Sorry, I misunderstood your earlier e-mail. I shouldn't multitask!
No worries. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
