On Jan 29 14:34, Andrey Repin wrote: > CV> That's basically correct. > > That's basically NOT correct. It setting permissions on ARCHIVES, that are NOT > CYGWIN INSTALLATION? Can it just write files, please? I have sane enough
No reason to shout. I was talking about the permission settings. They are correct from a POSIX perspective. I'm aware what you mean, that should have been clear from my reply. > For said reason. My local SID does not exist on remote machine, where archives > stored. Which shouldn't matter. The local machine fetches the SID from the ACL and evaluates it locally. Since it's your local account anyway it's not clear why it doesn't resolve it. > CV> Output of the Windows cacls command would have been more informative. > [...] > CV> Usually you don't have to. Your user account is known to your > CV> own machine, so I don't understand why it doesn't show the correct > CV> user name. > > Account, by name and password hash, yes. But local SID on my workstation and > SID for same named account on server is different. See above. > CV> Maybe, what setup should do is either to leave permissions alone when > CV> downloading the package files, or the permissions for the package files > CV> and the package directories should always be set to 664, so that the > CV> group (usually Administrators) has always write permissions. > > Leaving them alone. No two choices. I wasn't talking about two choices for the user, I was talking about two choices to implement it. However, setup.exe is not a simple beast and personally I have other things on my plate right now. But feel free to send a patch. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple