Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:14:11AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Nov 16 09:01, Dave Korn wrote:
>>>> aputerguy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So is 'subinacl' just another example of these badly behaved non-Cygwin
>>>>> applications?
>>>> Looks like it.
>>>>
>>>>> If so, is there anything one can do other than to use one of the other
>>>>> methods to get a properly authenticated ssh login?
>>>> You mean, apart from the other methods to get a properly authenticated
>>>> ssh
>>>> login, is there a method to get a properly authenticated ssh login? No,
>>>> there
>>>> is no method to get a properly authenticated ssh login, apart from the
>>>> methods
>>>> to get a properly authenticated ssh login. If you want a method to get a
>>>> properly authenticated ssh login, I'm afraid you're completely stuck;
>>>> you'll
>>>> just have to use one of the methods to get an authenticated ssh login.
>>> Sounds tricky...
>> Yep. It might be easier to just use one of the methods to get an
>> authenticated ssh login instead.
>
> Is that even possible though?
>
> cgf
I don't know, he'll have to try it. If it doesn't work, at least there's
always a workaround: use one of the methods to get an authenticated ssh login.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
