2009/8/22 Christopher Faylor: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 04:35:20PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:05:44PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >>>On 21/08/2009 03:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>>>Erm... sorry, but why would you want to do this? Either you have a >>>>1.5 based installation running a 1.5 perl, or you have a 1.7 based >>>>installation running a 1.7 perl. If you have two independent Cygwin >>>>trees, one 1.5 and one 1.7, then there won't be any collision either. >>>>I really don't understand what that's good for. >>> >>>A lot of unnecessary work on my end, perhaps? I'm with you on this >>>one; please do NOT do this. >> >>Ditto. I thought we'd already gone down this path and decided not to >>make tests based on the cygwin version number. Presumably configure >>should be smart enough and fine-grained enough to make the required >>decisions without this. > > Sorry. I pullled in configure here when it didn't make a lot of sense > but I really don't like the notion of using the cygwin version number > in any type of configuration.
Your wish is my command. So I will not change it. perl-5.10.1 will be released in a couple of days. -- Reini Urban http://phpwiki.org/ http://murbreak.at/ -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
