At 08:23 PM 3/14/2002, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:42:40PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote: > >>Thank goodness someone has found the Cygwin release that's a panacea > >>for all subsequent Cygwin ills! I'd heard B20 touted as this for so > >>long that I was afraid Cygwin would never reach such heights again. > >>Boy am I relieved! I guess there's no need for further Cygwin releases, > >>since 1.3.9 is now the cure all (actually, this makes me wonder why > >>there were any releases after B20....) Anybody have any idea what would > >>be a good use of the newly freed > >> > >>up time of members of this group? > > > > > >LOL! > >Ditto. > > >Although, the XEmacs-centric crowd has been recommending "stay at > >1.3.2" for some time, now. So unfortunately, 1.3.9 is NOT a complete > >panacea. We *may* actually have to keep developing cygwin...mebbe > >1.3.11 will be all the juicy goodness of 1.3.2 + 1.3.9, and then we can > >stop? > >Yes. I've heard that. They broke something in Xemacs so that it stopped >working with 1.3.3+. > >I think it's ttys or maybe processes or something. There is definitely some >kind of problem there that one of the developers should check into. I'd >do it but I don't get paid to work on Xemacs! > >I hope this helps someone track down the problem, at least. Unfortunately >I have no more time to help and I only know how to program cygwin, myself, >anyway.
I was thinking of asking Santa for the solution but I'm not sure I can wait that long. Maybe the Easter Bunny can help... Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 838 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
